The SCAN had raised ten questions in the RTI and apart from other general issues there were four pointed
K K Sema, SCAN spokesman, said on the RTI query as to why the Forest Department’s Staff on duty for the
The issue could lead to tribal clashes in the future as the NSCN-IM is dominated by Tangkhuls whose native
It is now therefore an established and confirmed fact that NSCN (IM) has taken over the full control of the Forest Department’s Intangki establishment, said Sema.
He said that asked to provide photo copies of the official vacation notice served to the Forest Department by the State Government directing them to vacate the premises of the quarters allotted to the staff stationed at Intangki Reserved Forest, the official response was “No such official vacation notice served by the State Government.”
He quoted the CIC court proceeding saying the PIO of Director, Intangki National Park, Dimapur, Nagaland, T Aochuba had stated that “the above developments mentioned by the applicants (now complainants) happened without the knowledge of the Forest Department and the matter was intimated to the Government, however, after the Ceasefire between the NSCN (IM) and the Government of India, it became apparent that the Government had some plan which is unknown”.
We need to clearly understand that the final solution must be fair and square for all Nagas no matter where they are”.
The SCAN stated that in the absence of sovereignty and integration let the Naga brothers in Manipur and Arunachal
The State of Nagaland cannot whimsically be converted into make-believe “Naga Nation” without integration and sovereignty, for all Nagas from everywhere to share equal rights with the Nagas of Nagaland while enjoying their exclusive privileges in their own State(s), the SCAN said.