With the Centre asking Meghalaya to return ₹300 crore sanctioned for land acquisition, the state government is now exploring a new railway proposal to Khliehriat in East Jaintia Hills, shifting focus from the Tetelia-Byrnihat and Byrnihat-Shillong railway projects which is likely to be scrapped. Chief Minister Conrad K. Sangma confirmed that the Government of India’s directive to return the funds signals the end of these long-delayed projects, which faced stiff opposition over concerns of influx.
“Already we have received a letter from the government of India to return back the money that was deposited for the Byrnihat and Shillong line. So technically these projects will most probably be shut. I don’t think railway will become a possibility in Shillong because the government of India has asked for the money back and most probably if the support is there and if positive response comes from East Jaintia Hills then we may be able to go ahead with the project there. We are also examining if there are other parts in the region of the state where we are able to take rail connectivity along with the consensus of the masses, we will try to move forward,” Sangma said.
He emphasized that any future railway expansion would depend on public consensus. “It is simple. We will go with the people’s support in this whole aspect as it is something which is being done for the people and for development, which we hope our people will understand as we move forward. Connectivity is important in today’s world. We have been trying to explain this to everybody. Of course certain organizations have their stand on it and we respect that stand,” he stated.
Acknowledging opposition, Sangma noted the need for broader discussions. “We have been talking to people and having different kinds of engagements at different levels. But whatever sense we could get from the general outreach programs and discussions is that there is a large resentment and not a positive one. Yes, there are some sections that are coming forward, but if there are more people who express their concerns and ideas, then it does help the cause. More importantly, if a much larger debate and discussion take place from the public point of view along with different organizations, it will be a healthier environment.”
On the possibility of extending rail connectivity to Garo Hills, Sangma said, “We can look at it, but provided that we are able to take everybody on board.”